Social Status and Underwear

Clothing, including underwear, was an important indicator of social status.

  • Nobility and Wealthy: The wealthy could afford fine linen for their undergarments, sometimes embroidered or decorated. Their underwear was often better tailored and more comfortable.
     

  • Peasantry: Common folk wore simpler, coarser linen shirts with less fit and finish. Their underwear was purely functional, without adornment.
     

  • Clergy: Monks and nuns wore specific undergarments suited to their religious vows and lifestyles, often plain and modest.
     

 


Special Garments: Lingerie and Bodices?

While the modern concept of lingerie did not exist in the Middle Ages, certain garments hinted at shaping or support.

  • Lacing and Tightening: From the 14th century onward, some women’s kirtles or gowns featured lacing, providing some degree of body shaping.
     

  • Corsetry: Early forms of corsetry appeared only towards the late medieval or early Renaissance periods, evolving into the structured garments of the Tudor era.
     

  • Thus, medieval undergarments were more about comfort and protection than aesthetics or sexual allure. shutdown123 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Comments on “Social Status and Underwear”

Leave a Reply

Gravatar